Showing posts with label Interviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Interviews. Show all posts
Sunday, December 29, 2013
The Alchemy Press Book of Pulp Heroes 2
Interview abut my story in The Alchemy Press Book of Pulp Heroes 2. I discuss the nature of pulp fiction, my musical tastes and why W.E. Johns is such a big influence on my writing.
Thursday, December 05, 2013
Ginger Nuts interview
For all of you desperate to read my interview that I did last year over at Ginger Nuts of Horror the website has moved so there's a new link to follow if you want to revel in my words of wisdom.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
Astrologica: Stories of the Zodiac
I've a story in Astrologica: Stories of the Zodiac from Alchemy Press. Other contributors include Joel Lane, Ralph Robert Moore and Storm Constantine.
I discuss my story, Star-crossed, in this interview, in which I am incredibly witty and charming and only offend a major religion once.
I discuss my story, Star-crossed, in this interview, in which I am incredibly witty and charming and only offend a major religion once.
Labels:
Alchemy Press,
Anthologies,
Astrologica,
Interviews
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Spare Parts 2003 interview
Just as a reminder that Spare Parts is now available as an eBook here's an interview with me and 2000AD scribe Alec Worley from when the original paperback version came out.
ALEC WORLEY: Are there any background details about
yourself that you want to fill the readers in on?
STUART YOUNG: You mean
apart from the fact that I’m incredibly witty and handsome? Oh -- you only want
honest answers. Fair enough.
I’ve
had over fifty stories published in various books and magazines including Roadworks, Darkness Rising, Kimota, and Nasty
Piece of Work. My monthly comics column, Words and Pictures, runs at www.thealienonline.net I work in a mental health community home.
And I live in Essex which is the finest county in the whole of England. Oh
yeah, honest answers only. Sorry.
AW: You had a story published in The Mammoth Book of
Future Cops. How did it feel to appear in a mass market paperback?
SY: I was
convinced the whole thing was a huge mistake, that I’d somehow been sent
someone else’s acceptance letter. Took seeing the book in Borders and
Waterstones to convince me otherwise. But somehow what gave me the biggest buzz
was when I unexpectedly stumbled across a copy whilst browsing in my local
library. Total shock. But in a good way.
AW:
How did your collection of horror stories, Spare
Parts, come about?
SY: That was
all part of a carefully orchestrated pitching campaign. Basically I waited
until John B. Ford was drunk and then said, “I’ve got some stories to show
you.” By the time he’d sobered up it was too late, he’d already accepted them.
Rainfall Books didn’t have any submission
guidelines so I ended up giving him far too many stories and he whittled it
down to his favourites. These turned out to be all the stories centring around
death and doomed love. This despite the fact that John has always struck me as
a very cheery person whenever I’ve met him. Just goes to show what a two-faced,
duplicitous wretch he really is.
Um,
John isn’t going to get to read this is he?
AW:
You have an eBook of fantasy stories coming out in 2004 called Shards of Dreams. Why
did you choose to branch out into fantasy instead of doing more horror?
SY: Well, when I
saw that Double Dragon published both fantasy and horror I was spoilt for
choice because I had enough stories to fill a collection in either genre. But
as people aren’t that aware of my fantasy stuff and Spare Parts was already full of horror stories I thought it would
be nice to showcase my fantasy work.
Besides,
some of the stories in Shards of Dreams
are quite dark. People getting broken, physically and mentally. Although others are comedies. It’s a bit of
a mix.
AW:
Does working at a mental home help in writing tales of horror and madness?
SY: Not too
often. I don’t base stories on things in the clients’ casenotes or anything.
Partly out of client confidentiality, partly because it’s not as though I work
in a challenging behaviour unit where the staff constantly deal with
knife-wielding psychopaths and the like. The home where I work is very settled
and the clients are really nice people.
AW:
So what sort of research do you do then?
SY: It depends.
Sometimes I fake it, just blag my way through a story. Other times I force
myself to actually do a bit of work. For example, the stories in Spare Parts all had varying degrees of
research to them.
‘Face
at the Window’ started off as a 500 word writing exercise so initially I didn’t
bother doing any research into Alzheimer’s but once it morphed into something
that might be worth submitting I got a book out of my local library and jotted
down some notes just to make it sound like I knew what I was talking about.
With
‘Swamp ‘Gator Blues’ I was kind of stuck for research. This was in the mid-90s,
before I got the Internet, so I had real trouble finding stuff that could help
me out. The original inspiration was Southern
Comfort but that was set in the 70s and I needed something more
contemporary. So I read possibly the most boring travel book ever written so I
could glean all the information it had on Louisiana. And I read novels by James
Lee Burke and Daniel Woodrell because they had bayou settings and Cajun heroes.
I even watched Jean Claude Van Damme’s Hard
Target for the bayou scenes. *shudders at the memory* Now THAT’s devotion
above and beyond the call of duty.
Other
times the research is already done and I’m just waiting for a story to use it
in. With ‘Spirits of and Darkness and Light’ I already knew a fair bit about
WWI fighter pilots because I used to be a big Biggles fan. I also liked the
Martin Falconer books by John Harris. (The story actually contains a few nods
to both these series.) Consequently as a kid I read up quite a bit on fighter
pilots, mainly from WWI and WWII, so years later when I wrote this story I only
needed to check the odd fact here and there.
‘Spare
Parts’ was inspired by an experiment I read about in New Scientist. The trick with the table is genuine although
obviously I play around with the possibilities for the sake of the story.
‘Boxes’
came about from a combination of my childhood obsession with Sherlock Holmes
stories and my more recent interest in the workings of the human mind; in this
case memory and perception. Books like Rita Carter’s Mapping the Mind were a great help.
‘Midnight
in a Perfect World’ probably looks like the story with the least research in
the collection but the concept only occurred to me after I went through a phase
of reading popular science books, trying to learn about quantum physics and the
structure of Time. But it comes across more as inspiration than research -- I
don’t actually talk about superpositions and overlapping timelines. I just use
metaphors for them within the story.
AW:
Do you have a particular method you follow when you write?
SY: I sacrifice a
small child to the gods of the creative muse. Usually works out at three
stories per sacrifice.
No,
normally I try to get the writing done either as soon as I get up or as soon as
I get back from work depending on what shift I’m working. My notes are normally
written up in the form of a mindmap with a beat by beat plot outline on the
back of the sheet. But sometimes I just improvise, depending on what mood I’m
in. Most of my writing is done at my computer, which I know you find totally
freakish, but I normally only write longhand if the PC is busted or my eyes are
tired from staring at the screen for too long.
I
tend to procrastinate like crazy when I’m supposed to write. Suddenly I want to
read my email, my snail mail, my story notes, the labels on tin cans; anything
I can think of to stop myself writing. But usually I’m okay once I convince
myself to actually sit down and start writing.
But
I keep a small child on standby just in case.
AW:
Do you have a specific aim in mind when you sit down to write a story?
SY: As far as I’m
concerned the most important thing is to entertain the reader. If they’re not
enjoying the story then why the hell should they read it? But there’s different
ways of entertaining people. Some people like to laugh, some people like to
cry, some people like to be frightened. So I try to cover different things --
comedy, tragedy, romance, adventure, horror etc -- in different stories. And
I’m always pleased when I can mix a few of these different approaches into the same story. It gives the tale that
little bit of texture, something for the reader to chew on. After all, life isn’t
stuck in only one emotional state so I don’t see why stories should be.
And
if I can write something that makes the reader think then that’s an added
bonus.
AW:
Are there any major Influences on your writing style?
SY: I’m always
discovering new influences or rediscovering old ones. For instance I recently started reading John Connolly’s novels
and I think they’re great. They’ve helped crystallise my thinking in terms of
some the stuff I was already doing in my writing whilst simultaneously giving me
ideas about new things to try.
Other
prose influences include James Ellroy, Joe R. Lansdale, Greg Egan, Douglas
Adams, Stephen Hunter, Alfred Bester, Andrew Vachss, Robert Bloch, and Michael
Moorcock. Basically writers who can keep a story moving with clear, uncluttered
prose. And who have either a sense of humour or a gripping story to tell.
Preferably both.
I’ve
learnt a lot from various comic book authors especially people like Neil
Gaiman, Frank Miller, Garth Ennis, Chris Claremont, Warren Ellis, Grant
Morrison, and Brian Michael Bendis. And then there’s Alan Moore who’s such a
complex writer; I’ve been reading his stuff since I was 15 but it’s only in the
last few years that I’ve figured out how to apply his techniques to my own
writing. I had to read a lot of stuff by Gaiman and Morrison, who were both
heavily influenced by Moore, and pick out various tricks that they employed and
then use that as a bridge to help me understand the mechanics of Moore’s
writing.
In
films you’ve got Die Hard, El Dorado, Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction,
Terminator 1 and 2, Aliens, The Long Kiss Goodnight, and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.
Films are a little like comics in that I can quite happily rewatch the story
several times. I’ll pick up stuff about
dialogue and plot structure just by osmosis. And then when I actually start
paying attention it’s, “Wow! So that’s how the writer gets that effect at that
point in the story!” One of the best films I know for learning story structure
is A Bug’s Life, the plot unfolds
with clockwork precision. Plus it’s laugh out loud funny. There’s probably
loads more, Hitchcock for a start, but like I say a lot of it comes through by
osmosis so it doesn’t always register on a conscious level.
Then
from TV Only Fools and Horses and Porridge. They know how to juxtapose
humour and poignancy brilliantly, luring you into a sad story and then hitting
you with a gag that makes you split your sides. Or they do the reverse, firing
off jokes in all directions and then suddenly poleaxing you with something so
sad that you can’t help but get a lump in your throat. As for Buffy, Angel, and Smallville --
I know some people hate these sort of programmes but I love ‘em. And The Simpsons and Futurama have a wonderful madcap energy, there’s always something
happening -- I’ve tried to recreate that effect in some of my more humorous
stories but I’m not in the same league.
AW: You’ve been praised for your realistic
characterisation. Would you say that is the most important aspect of your
stories?
SY:
I don’t know if it’s the most
important aspect but it’s definitely high up on the list. If the reader’s going
to spend the entire story reading about a character then they need something
about that character with which they can sympathise, or at least empathise. But
ideally plot and dialogue should be just as strong as characterisation. Each
element affects the others e.g. if you decide the protagonist of a story is
incredibly brave then the plot and dialogue are probably going to be vastly
different than if they’re a total coward.
AW: You play around with typography and fonts in some of
your stories. What inspired this particular trait?
SY:
Um, I can point towards certain influences
but I’m a little hazy on exactly when I came across them, or in what order.
Some of it came from -- I don’t know if this is the correct term -- shape
poems. You know, where the words are laid out across the page to take on the
shape of the subject of the poem.
But
a lot of it came from comic book style lettering where sound effects are drawn
in such a way to suggest volume and movement. For example the sound effect for
a car might be VRROOMMM to suggest
speed, acceleration, volume, and the direction the car is travelling in. Or
different characters might have different fonts for their dialogue to suggest
varying tones or accents.
Also,
Michael Moorcock and Alfred Bester used various typographical effects. And the
effect I use in ‘Boxes’ is an idea that I nicked from a Nicholas Royle story,
although the way it works within the context of his story and mine is totally
different.
I’m
trying not to overuse the typography. It’s always tempting to show off with it,
do it just for the sake of it. But I don’t want to be known as “that writer who
always uses the funny fonts.”
AW: I know you’re a big comics fan and have written some
strips yourself. Could you tell us a little about them?
SY: I did a
couple of strips with Bob Covington who won the British Fantasy Society Award
for Best Artist in 1999. I always get really jealous when I look at Bob’s art
because he draws so well but I can’t draw at all. Those strips both appeared in
Legend.
I’ve
written some gag strips for Dave Bezzina but we haven’t decided who to pitch
them to yet. Again, Dave is a superb artist. He and Bob both did a great job of
illustrating Spare Parts.
I’ve
done various strips for SF Revolution
Comics. With those I usually try to vary the genres. A WWI ghost story, a
piece of cyber-erotica, a 2000AD-ish
black comedy, some reality-warping SF/Horror. I also wrote an apocalyptic
comedy-drama called ‘Dead Light’ for Fusion
from Engine Comics. And I’ve written a two issue Samurai fantasy story called Seppuku also from Engine Comics.
AW:
What projects are you currently working on?
I’ve
just finished a novella. It probably falls under the heading of
religious/philosophical horror but don’t let that put you off, it’s a really
fun read, honest! There’s a how-to-write-comics book that I was invited to
write a tiny section of, basically
just a very brief summary of my experiences writing comics. The book hasn’t
been finalised yet though so I don’t know when it’s out or even what it’ll be
called. And I’m catching up with my comics column and reviews and interviews
and stuff. After that, I don’t know, maybe another novella or even a novel.
AW:
Any last thoughts you want to leave us with?
SY: BUY MY BOOKS!
No, I should probably say something profound and uplifting. Um ... ah, sod it. BUY MY BOOKS!
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
The Next Big Thing
This week I’m taking part in The Next Big Thing
series of networked author blog interviews. I’ve been tagged by CaroleJohnstone and next week I’ll be revealing who I tagged in to do the next round
of interviews.
1) What is the working title of your next book?
Reflections
in the Mind’s Eye.
2) Where did the idea come from for the book?
It was a carefully planned project to produce a range of
stories all linked thematically by their examinations of reality and human
consciousness. Or to put it another way, I had a bunch of short stories lying
about the place and lumped them all together in a collection.
3) What genre does your book fall under?
SF/fantasy/horror/crime; all mixed up in the same stories
like a literary bouillabaisse. Bookstores will have no idea where to stock it –
they’ll have to put a few pages in one section of the shop and a few pages in
another and at least a few pages locked away in the basement so they don’t
scare away the customers.
4) What actors would you choose to play the part of your
characters in a movie rendition?
While I was writing the novelette that makes up the bulk
of the book I had a vague idea of the protagonist being a Mel Gibson or Bruce
Willis type – handsome and athletic in their prime, but a bit more craggy and
creaky nowadays. I wasn’t thinking of their action roles so much as their
performances in Signs or The Sixth Sense where they’re in
Look-I’m-extending-my-range-(but-still-hoping-to-score-a-box-office-hit) mode.
I also think that Mila Kunis should play one of my
characters. Doesn’t matter which one, just so long as I get to canoodle with
her on the casting couch.
5) What is the one-sentence synopsis of your book?
A desperate attempt to allow me to shag Mila Kunis.
6) Will your book be self-published or represented by an
agency?
It’ll be published by Pendragon Press, an independent
publisher owned by Christopher Teague.
7) How long did it take you to write the first draft of the
manuscript?
The stories were all written separately over the course of
several years as individual projects. The earliest was written in 2001, the
most recent in 2010.
8)

By some crazy coincidence it shares qualities with all my
other books – hallucinations, disillusionment, dysfunctional relationships and
all that other fun stuff. Damaged
minds, damaged souls, damaged realities; that seems to be my literary
territory.
As for books by other authors, well, that’s just a minefield,
isn’t it? If I compare myself to some literary heavyweight like Shakespeare or
Dickens then I come across an egotistical moron. And even if I aim for someone
a bit lower down the scale whoever I pick will get all upset -- “Oh God, my
books are being compared to the ones by that hack Stuart Young! My reputation’s
ruined!” This is the kind of thing that can lead to cease and desist letters.
Anyway, at the risk of provoking future legal action there’s
probably some sort of resemblance between Reflections and Greg Egan’s Axiomatic
collection, which contains beautiful, emotionally charged stories about the
nature of consciousness and reality. Although my grasp of science is nowhere
near as good as Egan’s. He writes hard SF but my SF is much softer; my SF is so
soft it could be used to stuff pillows, if it was any softer it would be
practically liquid. There’s also Michael Marshall Smith’s What You Make It
with its mixture of tenderness, biting humour and world-weariness. And although
I didn’t really read much Charles L Grant until after Reflections was
already finished I like to think there’s some similarity in the prose style, as
well as the use of characterisation and quiet horror. (NB The horror in Reflections
is fairly quiet but some of the SF is in THX surround sound and is viewed in
HD, 3-D and even fiddle-de-dee.)
9) Who or what inspired you to write this book?
The title story came about due to reading John
Horgan’s non-fiction book The Undiscovered Mind, which featured some
scary stuff about brain surgery.
With ‘Crashes’, which appeared in the Catastrophia
anthology from PS Publishing, I tried to write something very silly but refrain
from turning it into a comedy, instead keeping it dramatically satisfying. To
the reader the events of the story are completely absurd but to the characters
they’re happening to the events are terrifying, which will hopefully
communicate itself back to the reader and the resulting cognitive dissonance
will somehow be hugely entertaining. Or at least more entertaining than the
pretentious twaddle of those last couple of sentences. I’d been reading some
Harlan Ellison stories and he really didn’t seem to care whether the tone in
his stories was consistent throughout so I thought I’d have a crack at that.
Grant Morrison was also an influence on that story, partly through inspiring
one of the key images, and partly through the fact that his comics, although
arch and amusing and often filled with preposterous situations, never quite make
the transition from drama to comedy.
With ‘Heartache’, which originally appeared in The Mammoth
Book of Future Cops, I was trying to write something in the Jim
Thompson/Andrew Vachss/Frank Miller noir mould, but with an SF twist. I was
particularly interested in exploring the kind of femme fatale Miller tends to
feature in Sin City and see if I could add some motivation and
psychological depth.
I’m
drawing a blank on what exactly inspired the other stories offhand, but I’m
sure that whatever the different inspirations were they would make for
wonderfully amusing anecdotes.
10) What else about the book might pique the reader's interest?
Each copy comes with a fifty pound note attached to the front
cover, courtesy of the publisher.
That thudding sound you just heard was Christopher Teague’s
jaw hitting the ground.
Friday, October 12, 2012
Fear and Wonder: The Spare Parts interview
As Spare Parts has been reissued as an ebook by Stumar Press I've dug up this interview from when the original Rainfall paperback was published. The interview is conducted by British Fantasy Award winning editor Pam Creais.
Pam Creais: Which writers did you enjoy most as a youngster?
Stuart Young: My favourites were Sherlock Holmes by Sir Arthur
Conan Doyle. Biggles by Captain W.E. Johns. Dr Who novelizations (especially
the Terrance Dicks ones; he also wrote several SF, horror, and detective novels
that I loved). The Willard Price Adventure series. The Wind in the
Willows by Kenneth Grahame. C.S. Lewis’s Narnia books. 101 Dalmatians
by Dodie Smith. John Harris’s Martin Falconer series. And The Hitch-Hikers
Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams.
And
then there were the comics like Watchmen, Dark Knight Returns, X-Men,
and Justice League International.
PC: When did you first start writing yourself?
SY: I can’t remember exactly. There were writing
assignments in school that never felt like assignments because they were just
fun to do. I remember doing an illustrated Mr Men story when I was about
six. And a few years later one of my friends was a huge Dr Who fan, he
had all the novelizations and he got me into reading them. He used to try
writing his own ones and I followed suit. So I’ve always wanted to be a writer.
But in terms of actually submitting stuff that would’ve been, I don’t know,
1995, or something like that.
PC: How did you become aware of the small press and what
was your first accepted story?
SY: I read somewhere that the small press was the place to try out your work before moving onto the big leagues. Of course then I had the problem that most small press magazines were horror and I knew pretty much zero about the genre so I had to slog my way through a bunch of novels and short stories that I absolutely hated before I found anything which fired that little spark of recognition -- “Hey, this is the kind if stuff I want to do!” Then I went through a period where I just collected rejection slips for about nine months. I was thinking, “Women have given birth quicker than this!” Eventually I wrote ‘Daddy’s Little Girl’ in a single afternoon and sold it to Nasty Piece of Work on my first submission.
PC: Do you think the small press is beneficial to
aspiring writers?
SY: It can be. If it works well you get Honourable
Mentions and agents see your work and approach you about writing novels and you
use it as a springboard to professional work. But if it doesn’t work well then
no one actually reads your stories. At all. In that case it becomes a vicious
circle; the publisher needs the readers so they can afford marketing to make
the magazine more visible to the readers, but the readers don’t buy the
magazine because they’ve never heard of it, so the publisher sells less copies
and has less money to spend on promoting it.
Of
course the small press can be a valuable way to hone your talents as a writer
before tackling the bigger publishers. Although even then there are problems.
Some authors write very specific types of fiction which only appeal to the real
aficionados of that particular genre. So all the die-hard fans of, I don’t
know, supernatural mysteries solved by Bavarian cheese-makers, buy the writer’s
stuff and tell them they’re a genius but when they step outside that circle into
the wider realms of publishing no one wants to read their work.
But
obviously not everyone can expect to get Stephen King type sales. So even if
you don’t hit the big time the progression through the different levels of the
small press (magazines, paperbacks, hardbacks) means that you’re reaching the
widest audience that’s possible for you.
Wow, that almost
sounds like I know what I’m talking about, doesn’t it?
PC: How did your first collection of stories, Spare
Parts, come about?
SY: I had a whole bunch of old horror short stories lying
around. Plus I had a couple of new ones that were too long for most magazines’
guidelines. So I put them together and showed them to John B. Ford at Rainfall
Books. John said he couldn’t use all the stories because there were just too
many of them so he picked out the ones he liked the best.
I was a
little disappointed because a lot of good stories didn’t make the final cut.
But the collection probably has more of a sense of identity this way as all the
stories John chose are about love and death. Which means I just took all my
characters and put them through the wringer. Make them fearful, make them break
down before the dark wonders of the universe. That’s a pretty good goal to aim
for in horror fiction; fear and wonder.
PC: Which writers in the small press scene do you most
admire?
SY: To be honest I’ve got behind on my reading in
the small press. Names that spring to mind are Mark Samuels and Matt Cardin who
both write very atmospheric philosophical horror. And I really admire the way
Tim Lebbon has used his success in the small press as a springboard to working
with bigger publishers. Gary Spencer Millidge writes a great comic called Strangehaven
which is this very English, very eccentric story about an idyllic village
that’s populated by Freemasons, South American shamans, and extraterrestrials.
It’s kind of a gentler version of The League of Gentlemen, but Millidge
did it first. And Paul Grist did a great crime comic called Kane but I’m
not sure if he’s still doing it because he’s doing Jack Staff for Image
these days.
PC: Is it equally gratifying to get a story published in
an e-zine as it is a hard copy publication?
SY: It depends. There’s pros and cons to both approaches.
When I had a story in The Mammoth Book of Future Cops I was jumping up
and down because it’s a mass market paperback, people can get hold of it
anywhere. But then my local bookshops didn’t stock it. On the other hand the
local libraries had multiple copies. Whereas if something goes online it’s
there for anyone to read.
I’ve
got an eBook of fantasy stories, called Shards of Dreams, coming out
soon so I’m curious to see what sort of business that does. In theory it’ll be
easy for people to get hold of because they can just click on the web site. But
they won’t actually have the book in their hand to let them flick through it
and decide if it’s the kind of thing they might want to buy. Hopefully they will
buy it because it’s got quite a good cross-section of my stories. There’s funny
stuff, scary stuff, adventure stuff. And my definition of fantasy is pretty
broad so it’s more like rocketships and flying cities and sentient universes
than goblins and elves. Which is not to say goblins and elves can’t be fun but
I know they’re the reason some people run away screaming when presented with
fantasy books.
PC: Have you considered writing a novel, and, if so, what
genre would you choose to write in?
SY: The longest prose piece I’ve completed to date is a
novella of religious/philosophical horror. Still waiting to see if anyone
publishes that.
I’ve
got some ideas for novels. Most of them would probably be described as horror.
Although one would definitely be SF and another would be fantasy or maybe
science fantasy.
It’s
just a question of which ones actually get written.
PC: Do you think that generally the market for
horror/fantasy fiction is on the wane in Great
Britain?
SY: Apart from stocking a few British authors like Simon
Clark most UK bookshops’ idea of horror is to sell US horror authors. And even
then you either need to have a franchise like Buffy or Anita Blake or else be
Stephen King who is a franchise in himself.
I’ve
lost track of modern adult fantasy authors but kids’ fantasy seems to be going
great guns. Their books look much more fun and tend to be written as series
rather serials. So even if you don’t complete the series at least you know the
book you’re reading at the time will have a complete story.
PC: Is it difficult to come up with new ideas in the area
of fantastic fiction: surely everything has been said and done nowadays?
SY: Good point. But that’s true of pretty much every area
of life. We all still have the same basic goals as our ancestors: survive as
long as you can in as much comfort as you can. But whereas for them that meant
sitting in a cave, thinking about the best way to get food for your family
whilst daubing a picture of a deer on the wall, for us it means sitting in a
house, worrying about the mortgage whilst the TV tells us what products to buy.
Meanwhile wars are still raging, politics is still as dishonest as ever. Even
modern physics like superstring theory can draw parallels with ancient
religious beliefs like Kabbalah. Sometimes it seems that the aim in any
endeavour is not so much to create something new as to refine what has gone
before.
But
that’s just off the top of my head. I’m sure there are holes in that argument
that you could drive a truck through.
So
if I can drag myself back to answering your original question: I’m not a real
scholar of fantastic fiction or weird fiction or whatever you want to call it.
Some stuff sticks in my head and some stuff doesn’t. I just write stories and
hope I’m not ripping anyone off too badly.
PC: Does your interest in the comic/graphic novel medium
influence your story writing?
SY: Definitely. I soaked up a lot of stuff about drama
and conflict from Stan Lee and Chris Claremont. Characters like Spider-Man and
the X-Men always struggled to do the right thing even though that would usually
end up making things worse for them.
And
in terms of story structure I found comics very helpful. Comics only have so
many pages per issue, and so many panels per page, and you can only fit so many
words in per panel. So everything -- plot, dialogue, description -- needs to be
as tightly written as possible. Although sloppy writing obviously isn’t
encouraged in prose the mechanics of writing aren’t always stressed to the same
degree, people often get caught up in the idea of metaphors and similies and
they forget about stuff like scene structure and tight plotting. To a certain
extent if you’re worrying about the economy of words and story structure in
prose then it’s a question of aesthetics, whereas in comics it’s a question of
necessity.
Even
in a comic like Seppuku, the miniseries I’ve written for Engine Comics,
where I had fifty-two pages to play with, I had to keep shaving the lines down
so that they’d fit. Every panel felt like, “Okay, I’ve got to explain this
character’s motivation whilst simultaneously moving the plot forward and
outlining a fundamental Zen concept. And I’ve got to do it in less than ten
words.”
PC: If someone gave you unlimited cash to make the genre
film of your dreams, what novel or story would you like to see make the
transition from the page to the big screen, and why?
SY: Oh God, there’s so many books and comics I’d like to
see made into films. Um, I’ll say Sandman by Neil Gaiman. Even though
Hollywood would totally screw it up.
Wednesday, August 01, 2012
Ginger Nuts of Horror interview
Jim Mcleod has interviewed me at the Ginger Nuts of Horror.
Topics covered include Star Wars comics, Jackie Chan films, the reissue of Spare Parts as an eBook and what not to say to someone in the gents toilets.
Labels:
Ginger Nuts of Horror,
Interviews,
Jackie Chan,
Spare Parts,
Star Wars
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Midnight Street interview and story
I've got an interview and story in the latest issue of Midnight Street
The magazine is free but if you go to the homepage there is an option to make donations if you happen to have some spare money lying around.
The magazine is free but if you go to the homepage there is an option to make donations if you happen to have some spare money lying around.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas from Jarly and Grarg, the comic strip characters created by Dave Bezzina and yours truly. My poem's rubbish but Dave's picture makes up for it:
The world shrugs on a frosty coat of snow,
And a cold wind whispered and cried,
It’s not just nippy, it’s thirty below.
Fortunately it’s warm inside.
Despite the late hour Jarly chooses to study;
The room’s cosy snugness makes it less of a chore.
The glowing fire makes his cheeks warm and ruddy,
He can concentrate so long as Grarg doesn’t snore.
Like any sensible creature at this time of night,
The sleepy little dragon lies all tucked up in bed.
Yet even lightly dozing he has an appetite,
His tail a makeshift toasting fork for a slice of bread.
Jarly ponders the worn ancient, arcane pages,
He seeks to gain the book’s hidden knowledge,
Become as wise as wizards, warlocks and sages,
Even though he never went to college.
In his pursuit to be powerful and bold
He ponders rune and sigil and glyph.
The hot fire prevents him feeling the cold,
His nose doesn’t run, nor does it sniff.
He could use these spells to confound his foes,
But as the candlelight elegantly flickers,
He feels content; no need to tread on toes.
This doesn’t feel the time for taunts, sneers or snickers.
Any old idiot can be a thug, hooligan or bully,
He should try to soothe and try to help.
Roll away people’s troubles with a magic lever and pulley,
Not try to hurt them or make them yelp.
As he arrives at his big decision
Emotions, desires and thoughts all align,
Concepts more complex than long division.
Magic grows within him and begins to shine.
Labels:
Comics,
David Bezzina,
Interviews,
Jarly and Grarg,
Writing
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Video interview
Me making a twat of myself in my first ever video interview
And despite what the video description says I won a British Fantasy Award not a Stoker.
And despite what the video description says I won a British Fantasy Award not a Stoker.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Old Interview
I'm far too lazy too post anything new at present so here's an old interview from just before The Mask Behind the Face came out.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)